Taking Europe To Its Extremes

Author:

De Vries Catherine E.1,Edwards Erica E.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Amsterdam,

2. Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS) Vienna,

Abstract

This article revisits the age-old debate about elite—mass linkages in the European Union (EU) by examining the way in which political contexts shape individual differentiation in Euroscepticism. We argue that the growing uncertainties about the future of European integration among national publics are increasingly politicized by Eurosceptical elites on both the extreme right and left of the political spectrum. To analyse the cueing effects of these extremist parties, we employ a two-level hierarchical linear model which combines individual-level and contextual data. We show that Eurosceptic cues are, indeed, found on both extremes, but for different reasons. Whereas right-wing extremist parties oppose European integration with the defence of `national sovereignty' and successfully mobilize national identity considerations against the EU, left-wing extremist parties resist further integration in Europe on the basis of the neoliberal character of the project and effectively cue voters against the EU on the basis of economic insecurity arguments.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference52 articles.

1. When in Doubt, Use Proxies

2. Economic Benefits and Support for Membership in the E.U.: A Cross-National Analysis

3. The Dynamics of Public Opinion toward European Integration, 1973-93

4. Brinegar, Adam P. and Seth K. Jolly (2004) `Integration: Using the Eurobarometer to Measure Support', in Jon C. Greer (ed.) Public Opinion and Polling Around the World, pp. 497-504. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.

5. Location, Location, Location

Cited by 346 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The divided public: Dynamics of heterogeneity of European public opinion towards European integration;European Union Politics;2024-09-05

2. Second phase: The activation stage;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

3. First phase: The latency equilibrium;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

4. Reported vote: An observational measure of political stigma;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

5. Dedication;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3