Affiliation:
1. IE University , Madrid, Spain
Abstract
Abstract
How can established political norms, such as stigma against radical-right politicians, change? The chapter argues that, for this to happen, it takes an exogenous trigger and a political entrepreneur. The trigger makes norms temporarily looser. The entrepreneur can read into this cue and realize that there is more private radical-right support than is typically observable. This gives them an incentive to run for election with the stigmatized ideology, activating silent radical-right preferences in their society. Following outgroup threat triggers, such as Islamist attacks, individuals disregard norms more. At the politician level, more intense attacks make new politicians run for election on radical-right platforms. These entrepreneurs are more skilled, and do better electorally. Discussing four country cases, the chapter highlights how these entrepreneurs explicitly breach established norms. Finally, it discusses a case where, because one necessary condition (the entrepreneur) was not present, no process of normalization was put into motion.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference723 articles.
1. The Centre-Right versus the Radical Right: The Role of Migration Issues and Economic Grievances;Abou-Chadi;Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,2022
2. Parties’ Policy Adjustments in Response to Changes in Issue Saliency;Abou-Chadi;West European Politics,2020
3. The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach;Abou-Chadi;British Journal of Political Science,2018
4. Economic Risk within the Household and Voting for the Radical Right;Abou-Chadi;World Politics,2021