Affiliation:
1. IE University , Madrid, Spain
Abstract
Abstract
How can one measure the influence of social norms using observational data? This chapter argues that whenever one can find variation in the publicness of a given political behavior, one can compare its prevalence across more private and more public settings. The gap provides a measure of the strength of social norms for or against that behavior. In an application of this logic, a measure of political stigma is proposed, called reported vote. Reported vote captures the proportion of the official vote for a party that is declared in post-electoral surveys. If there is a strong social norm against supporting a party, even individuals who voted for it have an incentive not to admit that they did so. A number of validation tests are presented for reported vote as a measure of political stigma. The chapter discusses how the logic underlying this variable can be used to construct other measures.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference723 articles.
1. The Centre-Right versus the Radical Right: The Role of Migration Issues and Economic Grievances;Abou-Chadi;Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,2022
2. Parties’ Policy Adjustments in Response to Changes in Issue Saliency;Abou-Chadi;West European Politics,2020
3. The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach;Abou-Chadi;British Journal of Political Science,2018
4. Economic Risk within the Household and Voting for the Radical Right;Abou-Chadi;World Politics,2021