Mobilization Model of Science Management: Pro et Contra

Author:

Fonotov Andrey1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The conditions, prospects and consequences of using the mobilization management model (hereinafter MM) in science are considered. It is shown that the problem of mobilization arises when politics invades the economy in order to force it to switch to achieving goals that are beyond the current and prospective economic environment. To this end, the economic mechanisms that regulate economic activity are replaced by a system of priorities for the concentration of quality resources in the areas of their own reproduction, ensuring the highest possible growth rates of quality resources over a certain period. The change in the direction of resource flows is carried out by discriminating against non-priority industries, giving rise to technological imbalance and qualitative heterogeneity of the production apparatus. The gap between the priority sphere and the rest of the economy under conditions of mobilization can only grow, leading in time to its disorganization. The situation of mobilization creates extremely disastrous conditions for scientific and innovative activity. Within the framework of the administrative-command system, the scientific ethos is destroyed, and the scientist turns from a researcher and creator into an official-manager for access and interpretation of new knowledge, functionally merging with the state bureaucracy. The logic of events arising from the use of the mobilization management model leads to destructive and disorganizing results. Its limited application is possible only within the framework of individual projects, an indispensable condition for the implementation of which is the existence of an independent system of regulation and control and a strict time frame for its work.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference14 articles.

1. Plusnin, J. M. (2022). Mobilization Management in Science. Science Management: Theory and Practice. Vol. 4, no. 3. P. 85–104. DOI 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.7 (In Russ.).

2. Pyastolov, S. M. (2023). Mobilization Project as a Form of Science Regulation. Science Management: Theory and Practice. Vol. 5, no. 1. P. С. 52–63. DOI 10.19181/smtp.2023.5.1.3. (In Russ.).

3. Jaremenko, Yu. V. (1981). Strukturnye izmeneniya v sotsialisticheskoi ekonomike [Structural changes in the socialist economy]. Moscow: Mysl. 300 p. (In Russ.).

4. Fonotov, A. G. (1993). Rossiya: ot mobilizacionnogo obshchestva k innovacionnomu [Russia: from a mobilization society to an innovative one]. Moscow: Nauka. 271 p. (In Russ.).

5. Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology [Russ. ed.: Otkrytye innovatsii: sozdanie pribyl'nykh tekhnologii]. Transl. from Eng. V. N. Egorov. Moscow: Pokolenije. 336 p. (In Russ.).

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3