On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1

Author:

Krivoruchko Vladimir1

Affiliation:

1. Independent researcher, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The article presents the details of ideas and proposals announced by the author in 2021 within the framework of the round table of the “Science Management: Theory and Practice” journal (on the topic “Science in an Innovative Economy”). The proposed measures are considered as increasingly relevant in the face of the long-term confrontation with the ‘collective West’ which is striving for scientific and technological isolation of contemporary Russia. The first part of the article gives an overview of the developments and trends observed both among Russian researchers, including scholars in science studies, and in the field of state regulation of scientific, academic and technological activities, as well as provides a critical analysis of organizational and legal aspects and practices of interaction between models of a ‘qualified customer’ and a ‘qualified contractor’ of scientific research and development. According to the results of the analysis, the author justifies the conclusion about the need for separation of scientific activities in present-day Russia. Separation is understood as the process of concentration and rational differentiation of the proper ‘scientific’ and then scientific and technological activities from the related quasi-scientific fields. The appropriate legal and organizational measures serve as the separator (separation mechanism) in this context. It is proposed to develop and implement them in the near future with the direct participation of Russian researchers endowed with state responsibility and the appropriate powers and authority.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Reference18 articles.

1. Krivoruchko V. V. On key measures to further reform Russian science. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2021;3(4):36–43. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.4.

2. Report on the implementation of the state scientific and technical policy in the Russian Federation and on the most important achievements won by Russian scientists [Doklad o realizatsii gosudarstvennoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politiki v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i o vazhneishikh dostizheniyakh, poluchennykh rossiiskimi uchenymi]. Moscow : RAS; 2023. (In Russ.).

3. Plusnin J. M. Mobilization management in science. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2022;4(3):85–104. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.7.

4. Gusev A. B. What mobilization reserve Russian science has. Nezavisimaya gazeta. 11.10.2022. Available at: https://ng.ru/nauka/2022-10-11/9_8562_reserve.html (accessed: 25.01.2024). (In Russ.).

5. Semenov E. V. Mobilization approach to science management: Between ideology and technology. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2023;5(2):210–218. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.18.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3