Affiliation:
1. Library for Natural Sciences of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
The extended use of scientometrics indicators case in a comprehensive results of scientific research assessment is considered. Based on the definition of scientometrics, showing the limits of its use, it is shown that such a solution goes beyond the range of its capabilities and the result of scientific works assessment obtained in this way is distorted. From the point of view of scientometrics analysis of the used indicator construction is carried out and its shortcomings in are pointed out. Possible means for the successful use of scientometrics in modern conditions are indicated.
Publisher
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
Reference13 articles.
1. Mokhnacheva, Ju. V. (2023). Document Types in WoS and Scopus: Similarities, Differences and Their Significance in the Analysis of Publication Activity. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty. No. 1. P. 38–43. DOI 10.36535/0548-0019-2023-01-4 (In Russ.).
2. Kuleshova, A. V. and Podvoyskiy, D. G. (2018). Paradoxes of Publication Activity in the Field of Contemporary Russian Science: Genesis, Diagnosis, Trends. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 4. P. 169–210. DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.10 (In Russ.).
3. Fonotov, A. G. (2023). Mobilization Model of Science Management: Pro et Contra. Science Management: Theory and Practice. Vol. 5, no. 2. P. 135–147. DOI 10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.10 (In Russ.).
4. Nalimov, V. V. and Mul'chenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya. Izuchenie razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics. Studying the development of science as an information process]. Moscow: Nauka. 192 p. (In Russ.).
5. Granovskii, Yu. V. (2000). Mozhno li izmeryat' nauku. Issledovaniya V. V. Nalimova po naukometrii [Is it possible to measure science. V. V. Nalimov's research on scientometry]. Naukovedenie. No. 1. P. 160–183. (In Russ.).