Implementation of Visual-Only Swine Inspection in the European Union: Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons Learned

Author:

RIESS L. ELIZABETH1,HOELZER KARIN1

Affiliation:

1. The Pew Charitable Trusts, 901 East Street N.W., Washington, DC 20004, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Consumption of contaminated meat and poultry products is a major source of foodborne illness in the United States and globally. Meat inspection procedures, established more than 100 years ago to detect prevailing food safety issues of the time and largely harmonized around the world, do not effectively detect modern hazards and may inadvertently increase food safety risks by spreading contamination across carcasses. Visual-only inspection (VOI) is a significantly different, modernized meat inspection system that is data driven and minimizes physical manipulation of the carcass during inspection. It was developed based on scientific evidence and risk assessment and aims to better control current food safety hazards. In 2014, the European Union (EU) became the first supranational government in the world to require VOI for all swine herds slaughtered in member states that met certain epidemiologic and animal rearing conditions. Here, we review the implementation of this new inspection system with the goal of informing similar modernization efforts in other countries and for other commodities beyond pork. This article reports the results of a literature review and interviews conducted with nine experts in 2018 on the implementation of the EU's 2014 VOI regulation. Challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned about the implementation of the regulation are described for audiences interested in adapting inspection procedures to prevent and detect modern food safety hazards. Overall, implementation of VOI varies within and across member states, and among slaughterhouses of different sizes. This variation is due to disease risk patterns, supply chain conditions, and trade barriers. Before transitioning to a similar risk-based meat inspection system, other countries should consider the following: science-based research agendas to identify what food chain information best predicts herd health and foodborne hazards, regulatory system design that accurately reflects local hazards, and development of targeted VOI educational materials. HIGHLIGHTS

Publisher

International Association for Food Protection

Subject

Microbiology,Food Science

Reference87 articles.

1. Alban, L., Alburquerque E. R., de Sá C. V. G. C., Buholzer P., Vieira-Pinto M., Langkabel N., Meemken D., Pointon A., Hamilton D., and AbleyM. 2018. Modernisation of meat inspection of pigs: the world is on the move towards a more evidence-based type of inspection. Fleischwirtschaft Int. 2: 8– 15.

2. Alban, L., and StärkK. D. C. 2005. Where should the effort be put to reduce the Salmonella prevalence in the slaughtered swine carcass effectively?Prev. Vet. Med. 68: 63– 79.

3. Alban, L., Steenberg B., Petersen J. V., and JensenS. 2010. Is palpation of the intestinal lymph nodes a necessary part of meat inspection of finisher pigs? Danish Agriculture & Food Council, Copenhagen. Available at: https://lf.dk/∼/media/lf/aktuelt/publikationer/svinekod/ukrisikovurdering-kroeslymfeknuder-koedkontrol.pdf?la=da. Accessed 9 July 2019.

4. Alban, L., Vilstrup C., Steenberg B., Jensen H. E., Aalbaek B., Thune-Stephensen F., and JensenS. 2008. Assessment of risk for humans associated with Supply Chain Meat Inspection—The Danish Way. Danish Veterinary and Food Administration. Available at: https://lf.dk/∼/media/lf/aktuelt/publikationer/svinekod/modernisation-of-meat-inspection-dk.pdf?la=da. Accessed 9 July 2019.

5. Baekbo, A. K., Petersen J. V., Cucurella C., Orive F. D., Ghidini S., Hviid M., Ellebroek L., Kruse A. B., Thune-Stephensen F., Ooberg D., Hojgaard A. R., and AlbanL. 2015. Visual-only inspection in swine—different status for implementation in European countries. Fleischwirtschaft Int. 6: 26– 31.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3