Author:
McGoldrick Peter J.,Betts Erica J.,Keeling Kathy A.
Abstract
In spite of their importance within pricing strategies, “seasonal sales” have received little attention within the literature. The recent interest in “high‐low” pricing has, however, increased the attention given to temporal shifts in store‐wide, rather than item level, prices. Following a brief review, this paper draws upon two case studies of leading retailers of apparel in the UK. Evidence is also presented from audits of pricing and markdown activities over a three‐year period, illustrating some contrasts between stated strategies and actual pricing activities. A cost‐benefit analysis of high‐low pricing requires knowledge of consumer preferences and attitudes. Results are drawn from a study of over 2,600 “sale” shoppers, indicating stated preferences for markdown frequency, depth and coverage. In general “sale” shoppers appear to prefer a variety of markdown levels, increasing their scope to succeed as bargain hunters.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing
Reference24 articles.
1. Bates, A.D. (1990), “Pricing for profit”, Retailing Issues Letter, Arthur Anderson & Co., Vol. 2 No. 8, pp. 1‐2.
2. Berry, L. (1986), “Multidimensional strategies combat price wars”, Marketing News, Vol. 31, January, p. 10.
3. Biswas, A. and Blair, E.A. (1991), “Contextual effects of reference prices in retail advertisement”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55 No. 3, pp. 1‐12.
4. Biswas, A., Wilson, E.J. and Licata, J.W. (1993), “Reference pricing studies in marketing: a synthesis of research results”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 239‐56.
5. Bobinski, G.S., Cox, D. and Cox, A. (1996), “Retail ‘sales’ advertising, perceived retailer credibility and price rationale”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 291‐306.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献