Abstract
AbstractAndrew Eshleman has argued that atheists can believe in God by being fully engaged members of religious communities and using religious discourse in a non-realist way. He calls this position ‘fictionalism’ because the atheist takes up religion as a useful fiction. In this paper I critique fictionalism along two lines: that it is problematic to successfully be a fictionalist and that fictionalism is unjustified. Reflection on fictionalism will point to some wider problems with religious anti-realism.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Primitivism;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
2. Inconsistency theories;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
3. Further objections to nihilism;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
4. Truth in philosophy;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
5. Conclusion;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10