Abstract
Some have proposed that it is reasonable for an atheist to pursue a form of life shaped by engagement with theistic religious language and practice, once language and belief in God are interpreted in the appropriate non-realist manner. My aim is to defend this proposal in the face of several objections that have been raised against it. First, I engage in some conceptual spadework to distinguish more clearly some varieties of religious non-realism. Then, in response to two central objections, I seek to articulate the most promising version of the view. I conclude by discussing some practical and moral objections to a non-realist form of religious life.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Taking Issue with Le Poidevin’s New Agnosticism;Philosophia;2024-07-18
2. Religion, fiction, and facts;Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology;2023-10-06
3. Do religious fictionalists face a problem of evil?;Religious Studies;2023-04-27
4. Metaphors, religious language and linguistic expressibility;International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;2023-04-08
5. Atheistic modal realism;Religious Studies;2022-10-24