Author:
Dinas Elias,Riera Pedro,Roussias Nasos
Abstract
Why are some small parties successful whereas others wither away? Despite the voluminous literature on parties and party families, we have a limited understanding of what explains small party success. Most studies tend to emphasize the role of social cleavages and electoral systems. Instead, we propose a new institutional explanation that treats entering parliament as a key resource for small parties. Parliamentary entrance signals organizational capacity and candidates’ appeal, and reduces uncertainty about parties’ ideological profile. Taking advantage of the discontinuities generated by thresholds of representation, we estimate the causal effect of entering parliament on the future vote shares of small parties. We use a new data set that covers all post-WWII democracies with a national threshold of representation. Results indicate that presence in parliament increases parties’ vote share in the next election. Importantly, entering parliament is more important for parties in new democracies, where party branding is weak and the need for signaling is high.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. How the radical right reshapes public opinion: the Sweden Democrats’ local mobilisation, 2002–2020;West European Politics;2024-09-12
2. Second phase: The activation stage;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02
3. First phase: The latency equilibrium;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02
4. Reported vote: An observational measure of political stigma;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02
5. Dedication;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02