A Theoretical Framework for Fostering Diagnostic Competences with Simulations in Higher Education-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Theoretical Framework for Fostering Diagnostic Competences with Simulations in Higher Education

Published:2022 Issue: Volume: Page:5-16
ISSN:
Container-title:Learning to Diagnose with Simulations
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Chernikova Olga,Heitzmann Nicole,Opitz Ansgar,Seidel Tina,Fischer Frank

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter presents an overview of the theoretical and empirical evidence on the effectiveness of simulation-based learning in higher education for learners in the domains of medical and teacher education. First and foremost, it presents a theoretical framework for fostering diagnostic competences in simulation-based environments. This theoretical framework was utilized to develop the simulations described in this book and contribute to generating further empirical evidence on the effective design of simulation-based learning environments in the context of diagnosis. Moreover, this chapter presents insights from a meta-analytic study supporting the importance of learners’ individual prerequisites as well as the instructional and contextual factors described in the model.

Funder

Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-89147-3_2

Reference47 articles.

1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). Cognitive science series. The architecture of cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..

2. Beauchamp, C. (2015). Reflection in teacher education: Issues emerging from a review of current literature. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 16(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.982525

3. Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 505–518). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_39

4. Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999

5. Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Collaborative Problem-Solving in Knowledge-Rich Domains: A Multi-Study Structural Equation Model;International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning;2024-06-24

2. Categorization of simulated diagnostic situations and the salience of diagnostic information;Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie;2024-01

3. Feedback on teachers' text assessment: Does it foster assessment accuracy and motivation?;Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie;2024-01

4. Live and Video Simulations of Medical History-Taking: Theoretical Background, Design, Development, and Validation of a Learning Environment;Learning to Diagnose with Simulations;2022

5. Learning to Diagnose Students’ Behavioral, Developmental, and Learning Disorders in a Simulation-Based Learning Environment for Pre-Service Teachers;Learning to Diagnose with Simulations;2022