Categorization of simulated diagnostic situations and the salience of diagnostic information

Author:

Machts Nils1ORCID,Chernikova Olga2,Jansen Thorben3ORCID,Weidenbusch Marc4ORCID,Fischer Frank2,Möller Jens1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Psychology of Learning and Instruction (IPL), Kiel University, Germany

2. Chair of Education and Educational Psychology, University of Munich (LMU), Germany

3. Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (IPN), Kiel University, Germany

4. University Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Germany

Abstract

Abstract: Simulated diagnostic situations function as learning environments and research tools to deepen the understanding of diagnostic processes. In this conceptual paper, we present a framework that fulfils two purposes. First, we categorize simulations of diagnostic situations using six descriptive components: physical environment, social embeddedness, diagnostic tasks, activities, information, and decisions. Second, we discriminate the salience of diagnostic information into four facets: access, prominence, simplicity, and clarity. These facets determine the likelihood that participants in a simulation will perceive and process relevant diagnostic information toward correct or accurate diagnostic decisions. We use one simulation to explain these components and facets in more detail. With this systematic conceptualization, we intend to deepen the understanding of how and why simulations work in creating authentic diagnostic situations, measuring diagnostic competencies, and providing learning environments for the facilitation of these competencies in higher education.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Facilitating diagnostic competences with simulations;Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie;2024-01

2. Where salience goes beyond authenticity;Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie;2024-01

3. Facilitating justification, disconfirmation, and transparency in diagnostic argumentation;Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie;2024-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3