Affiliation:
1. William T. Grant Foundation, New York, NY, USA
Abstract
University faculty have the talent, creativity, and training to tackle the serious challenges confronting our education system today, but the incentive structure in universities is often at odds with real-world contributions. What tensions are experienced by faculty who may be interested in partnership-oriented, engaged scholarship? How can these tensions be addressed? This chapter explores the tensions, particularly in the context of education research-practice partnerships, and provide examples from universities that are taking steps to lessen the tensions and encourage faculty participation in partnerships. By adopting new structures and incentives, these universities are providing a pathway to engaged scholarship that may ultimately increase the power of research to address the problems that educators face each day. However, university leaders who are implementing institutional change must grapple with long-established norms and traditions, and show how new ways of assessing the value of research will benefit universities as well as their communities.
Reference46 articles.
1. Conceptualizing 20 years of engaged scholarship: A scoping review
2. Bobonis G., Medelius N. R. (2019). Policy-makers and researchers collaborate to improve education quality in Puerto Rico. Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL). https://www.povertyactionlab.org/blog/7-9-19/policymakers-and-researchers-collaborate-improve-education-quality-puerto-rico
3. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2022). Elective classification for Community Engagement: 2024 first time documentation guide to the application. Author. https://carnegieelectiveclassifications.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2024-Community-Engagement-First-Time-Classification-Guide-5.10.2022.pdf
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献