Affiliation:
1. University of Cologne, Germany
Abstract
Previous research has consistently found widespread attitudinal impacts of terrorist attacks. Using data from the European Social Survey, which was conducting interviews in 11 countries when the Charlie Hebdo attacks happened in January 2015, I compare respondents from before and after the shootings to test whether the event shifted public opinion on several topics. There is no evidence of average impacts across a range of issues, from xenophobia to ideological self-placement and immigration policy preferences. Data collected when the Paris November 2015 shootings happened also present no evidence of public opinion change on immigration and refugee policy matters in France, but there appears to be an effect in other countries—which varies according to contextual vulnerability. Results suggest that views on immigration and immigrants have, to a certain extent, stabilized in Europe and are less susceptible to shifts from dramatic events.
Cited by
81 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Second phase: The activation stage;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02
2. First phase: The latency equilibrium;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02
3. Reported vote: An observational measure of political stigma;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02
4. Dedication;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02
5. Additional materials and analyses;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02