Explicit Reasoning, Confirmation Bias, and Illusory Transactive Memory

Author:

Tschan Franziska1,Semmer Norbert K.2,Gurtner Andrea3,Bizzari Lara4,Spychiger Martin5,Breuer Marc5,Marsch Stephan U.5

Affiliation:

1. University of Neuchâtel,

2. University of Bern

3. Berne University of Applied Sciences

4. University of Neuchâtel

5. University Hospital, Basel

Abstract

Teamwork is important in medicine, and this includes team-based diagnoses. The influence of communication on diagnostic accuracy in an ambiguous situation was investigated in an emergency medical simulation. The situation was ambiguous in that some of the patient's symptoms suggested a wrong diagnosis. Of 20 groups of physicians, 6 diagnosed the patient, 8 diagnosed with help, and 6 missed the diagnosis. Based on models of decision making, we hypothesized that accurate diagnosis is more likely if groups (a) consider more information, (b) display more explicit reasoning, and (c) talk to the room. The latter two hypotheses were supported. Additional analyses revealed that physicians often failed to report pivotal information after reading in the patient chart. This behavior suggested to the group that the chart contained no critical information. Corresponding to a transactive memory process, this process results in what we call illusory transactive memory. The plausible but incorrect diagnosis implied that the two lungs should sound differently. Despite objectively identical sounds, some physicians did hear a difference, indicating confirmation bias. Training physicians in explicit reasoning could enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference81 articles.

1. Argyle, M. & Henderson, M. (1985). The rules of relationships. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships (pp. 63-84). London : Sage.

2. Distributed Cognition in an Emergency Co-ordination Center

3. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance.

4. Beach, L.R., Chi, M., Klein, G., Smith, P. & Vicente, K. (1997). Naturalistic decision making and related research lines. In C. E. Zsambok & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 29-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cited by 97 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3