The Cardiometabolic Risk Profile of Underreporters of Energy Intake Differs from That of Adequate Reporters among Children at Risk of Obesity

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Misreporting of energy intake (EI) in nutritional epidemiology is a concern because of information bias, and tends to occur differentially in obese compared with nonobese subjects. Objective We examined characteristics of misreporters within a cohort of children with a parental history of obesity and the bias introduced by underreporting. Methods The QUebec Adipose and Lifestyle InvesTigation in Youth (QUALITY) cohort included 630 Caucasian children aged 8–10 y at recruitment with ≥1 obese parent [body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) >30 or waist circumference >102 cm (men), >88 cm (women)] and free of diabetes or severe illness. Children on antihypertensive medications or following a restricted diet were excluded. Child and parent characteristics were measured directly or by questionnaire. Three 24-h dietary recalls were administered by phone by a dietitian. Goldberg's cutoff method identified underreporters (URs). Logistic regression identified correlates of URs. We compared coefficients from linear regressions of BMI after 2 y on total EI at baseline 1) in all participants; 2) in adequate reporters (ARs) (excluding URs); 3) in all participants statistically adjusted for underreporting; 4) excluding URs using individual physical activity level (PAL)-specific cutoffs; and 5) in all participants statistically adjusted for underreporting using PAL-specific cutoffs. Results We identified 175 URs based on a calculated cutoff of 1.11. URs were older, had a higher BMI z score, and had poorer cardiometabolic health indicators. Parents of URs had a lower family income and higher BMI. Child BMI z score (OR: 3.07; 95% CI: 2.38, 3.97) and age (OR: 1.46/y; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.87/y) were the strongest correlates of underreporting. The association between BMI and total EI was null in all participants but became significantly positive after excluding URs (ß = 0.62/1000 kcal; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.92/1000 kcal) and after adjustment for URs (ß = 0.85/1000 kcal; 95% CI: 0.55, 1.06/1000 kcal). Conclusions URs in 8- to 10-y-old children differed from ARs. Underreporting biases measurement of nutritional exposures and the assessment of exposure-outcome relations. Identifying URs and using an appropriate correction method is essential.