The wide range of factors contributing to wind resource assessment accuracy in complex terrain
-
Published:2022-07-19
Issue:4
Volume:7
Page:1503-1525
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
Barber SarahORCID, Schubiger Alain, Koller Sara, Eggli Dominik, Radi Alexander, Rumpf Andreas, Knaus Hermann
Abstract
Abstract. Understanding the uncertainties of wind resource assessments (WRAs) is key to reducing project risks, and this is particularly challenging in mountainous terrain. In the academic literature, many complex flow sites have been investigated, but they all focus on comparing wind speeds from selected wind directions and do not focus on the overall annual energy production (AEP). In this work, the importance of converting wind speed errors into AEP errors when evaluating wind energy projects is highlighted by comparing the results of seven different WRA workflows at five complex terrain sites. Although a systematic study involving the investigation of all possible varying parameters is not within the scope of this study, the results allow some of the different factors that could lead to this discrepancy being identified. The wind speed errors are assessed by comparing simulation results to wind speed measurements at validation locations. This is then extended to AEP estimations (without wake effects), showing that wind profile prediction accuracy does not translate directly or linearly to AEP accuracy. This is due to the specific conditions at the site, to differences in workflow set-ups between the sites and to differences in workflow AEP calculation methods. The results demonstrate the complexity of the combined factors contributing to WRA errors – even without including wake effects and other losses. This means that the wind model that produces the most accurate wind predictions for a certain wind direction over a certain time period does not always result in the most suitable model for the AEP estimation of a given complex terrain site. In fact, the large number of steps within the WRA process often lead to the choice of wind model being less important for the overall WRA accuracy than would be suggested by only looking at wind speeds. It is therefore concluded that it is vitally important for researchers to consider overall AEP – and all the steps towards calculating it – when evaluating simulation accuracies of flow over complex terrain. Future work will involve a systematic study of all the factors that could contribute to this effect.
Funder
Bundesamt für Energie Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference28 articles.
1. Alletto, M., Radi, A., Adib, J., Langner, J., Peralta, C., Altmikus, A., and
Letzel, M.: E-Wind: Steady state CFD approach for stratified flows used for
site assessment at Enercon, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 072020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072020, 2018. a 2. Bao, J., Chow, F. K., and Lundquist, K. A.: Large-Eddy Simulation over Complex Terrain Using an Improved Immersed Boundary Method in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 2781–2797,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0067.1, 2018. a 3. Barber, S., Buehler, M., and Nordborg, H.: IEA Wind Task 31: Design of a new comparison metrics simulation challenge for wind resource assessment in
complex terrain Stage 1, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 062013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/6/062013, 2020a. a 4. Barber, S., Schubiger, A., Koller, S., Rumpf, A., Knaus, H., and Nordborg, H.: Actual Total Cost reduction of commercial CFD modelling tools for Wind
Resource Assessment in complex terrain, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 062012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/6/062012, 2020b. a, b, c, d 5. Barber, S., Schubiger, A., Koller, S., Eggli, D., Rumpf, A., and Knaus, H.: A
new process for the pragmatic choice of wind models in complex terrain, final
report, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences,
https://drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/DGxWeKQ35nnbPMW (last access: 18 July 2022), 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|