IEA Wind Task 31: Design of a new comparison metrics simulation challenge for wind resource assessment in complex terrain Stage 1

Author:

Barber S,Buehler M,Nordborg H

Abstract

Abstract In wind energy, the accuracy of the estimation of the wind resource has an enormous effect on the expected rate of return of a project. For a given project, the modeller is faced with a difficult choice of a wide range of simulation tools with varying accuracies and costs. In previous work, a new method for estimating the skill and cost scores of different wind modelling tools for a given project has been developed. Although this method worked well, it was shown that further studies are required for a wide range of input conditions and project types in order to develop project-specific transfer functions between the predicted and actual cost and skill scores. In this paper therefore, a new simulation challenge is designed with the goal of collecting comparison metrics data regarding the skill and cost scores of a range of different simulation tools for a complex terrain site, both before and after carrying out the simulations. The complex terrain site Perdigao is chosen for the challenge, due to the volume and quality of available measurement data and the complexity of the terrain. An initial data analysis and WAsP simulations allow mast 29 to be chosen for the input data and masts 7, 10, 20, 22, 25, 27, 34 and 37 for the validation data. The WAsP simulations are compared to previous WRF simulations and are found to capture the main features of the flow over the two ridges. The wind acceleration over the two ridges and the resulting maximum wind speeds at the peak of the ridges as well as the reduced velocity regions in the valley between the ridges are well captured. However, smaller-scale features such as small areas of separated flow seen in the WRF simulations cannot be captured by WAsP. This choice of mast for the challenge will therefore allow the capabilities of different tools for calculating flow in separated regions as well as on top of hills to be assessed.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy

Reference11 articles.

1. The Bolund Experiment, Part 1: Flow over a steep, three-dimensional hill;Berg;Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2011

2. The Perdigao: Peering into microscale details of mountain winds;Fernando;Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3