Ice multiplication from ice–ice collisions in the high Arctic: sensitivity to ice habit, rimed fraction, ice type and uncertainties in the numerical description of the process
-
Published:2021-06-29
Issue:12
Volume:21
Page:9741-9760
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Sotiropoulou GeorgiaORCID, Ickes LuisaORCID, Nenes AthanasiosORCID, Ekman Annica M. L.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Atmospheric models often fail to correctly reproduce the
microphysical structure of Arctic mixed-phase clouds and underpredict ice
water content even when the simulations are constrained by observed levels
of ice nucleating particles. In this study we investigate whether ice
multiplication from breakup upon ice–ice collisions, a process missing in
most models, can account for the observed cloud ice in a stratocumulus cloud
observed during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS) campaign. Our results indicate
that the efficiency of this process in these conditions is weak; increases
in fragment generation are compensated for by subsequent enhancement of
precipitation and subcloud sublimation. Activation of collisional breakup
improves the representation of cloud ice content, but cloud liquid remains
overestimated. In most sensitivity simulations, variations in ice habit and
prescribed rimed fraction have little effect on the results. A few
simulations result in explosive multiplication and cloud dissipation;
however, in most setups, the overall multiplication effects become
substantially weaker if the precipitation sink is enhanced through cloud-ice-to-snow autoconversion. The largest uncertainty stems from the
correction factor for ice enhancement due to sublimation included in the
breakup parameterization; excluding this correction results in rapid
glaciation, especially in simulations with plates. Our results indicate that
the lack of a detailed treatment of ice habit and rimed fraction in most
bulk microphysics schemes is not detrimental for the description of the
collisional breakup process in the examined conditions as long as cloud-ice-to-snow autoconversion is considered.
Funder
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas Horizon 2020
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference73 articles.
1. Andronache, C.: Characterization of Mixed-Phase Clouds: Contributions From
the Field Campaigns and Ground Based Networks, in: Mixed-Phase Clouds:
Observations and Modeling, edited by: Andronache, C., 97–120, Elsevier,
the Netherlands, UK,
USA, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810549-8.00005-2, 2017. 2. Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K.
J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The
importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase
clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278, 2013. 3. Bigg, E. K. and Leck, C.: Cloud-active particles over the central Arctic
Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 32155–32166, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901152, 2001. 4. Burt, M. A., Randall, D. A., and Branson, M. D.: Dark warming, J.
Climate, 29, 705–719, 2015. 5. Cao, Y., Liang, S., Chen, X., He, T., Wang, D., and Cheng, X.: Enhanced
wintertime greenhouse effect reinforcing Arctic amplification and initial
sea-ice melting, Sci. Rep., 7, 8462, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08545-2, 2017.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|