Author:
Berry B W,Joseph A L,Chen A A
Abstract
Two methods were used to evaluate bacterial recovery from beef, pork, and lamb adipose tissue. Higher counts were obtained with a tissue removal and fluid agitation technique (shaking) than with surface swabbing, but only when bacterial levels were low. Bacterial recovery by both methods was unaffected by specie origin of adipose tissue and differences in surface texture, sample storage time (12 versus 6 days), and duration fluid agitation (5 versus 10 min).
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference5 articles.
1. Quantifying bacteria on poultry carcass skin;Avens J. S.;Poultry Sci.,1970
2. An evaluation of techniques commonly used to quantitatively determine the bacterial population of chicken carcasses;Fromm D.;Poultry Sci.,1959
3. Steel R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York.
4. Vanderzant C. Z. L. Carpenter and G. C. Smith. 1976. Sampling carcasses and meat products p. 258-267. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Rec. Meat Conference.
5. Yokoya F. and M. L. Zulzke. 1975. Method for sam
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献