Comparative Performance Evaluation of Real-Time PCR and Dual-Labeled Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Probe-Based Melt Peak Analysis for the Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Beef Products

Author:

BOSILEVAC JOSEPH M.1,DWIVEDI HARI P.2,CHABLAIN PATRICE3,ULLERY MICHAEL2,BAILEY JOSEPH S.2,DUTTA VIKRANT2

Affiliation:

1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Spur 18D, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA

2. bioMérieux, Inc., 595 Anglum Road, Hazelwood, Missouri 63042, USA

3. bioMérieux SA, F-69280, Marcy-l'Étoile, France

Abstract

ABSTRACT Contaminated beef and beef products remain a frequent vehicle for the transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7. The current U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) regulatory testing for E. coli O157:H7 uses the method described in the USDA-FSIS Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG), chapter 5. At times, described presumptive test results are nonconfirmable, suggesting that recent PCR technological advancements and presumed enhanced sensitivity and specificity may offer beneficial changes. Here, we have evaluated the precision and sensitivity of a fluorescence resonance energy transfer–based real-time PCR assay called ECO for the detection of E. coli O157:H7. ECO detects the gene target specific to both E. coli O157:H7 and E. coli O157:non-H7 but distinguishes the two by using a melt curve analysis. A total of 3,113 O157:H7 and O157:non-H7 isolates were used to define this melting temperature–based criteria. The simulated comparative performance evaluation in the spiked beef samples indicated detection of 3 of 3 samples by ECO at <3.3 log CFU/mL, whereas MLG only detected 1 of 3 (<3.3 log CFU/mL). Using modified tryptic soy broth–enriched natural beef and veal product samples (n = 452), the comparative sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, and false-negative rate against culture between MLG and ECO were 75 versus 92%, 91 versus 99%, 8.9 versus 0.77%, and 25 versus 8.3%, respectively. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the overall accuracy were found to be 56 versus 94%, 96 versus 98%, and 88 versus 98%, for MLG and ECO, respectively. These data demonstrate that the ECO assay is comparable to MLG detection of E. coli O157:H7 and offers improved sensitivity.

Publisher

International Association for Food Protection

Subject

Microbiology,Food Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3