Abstract
ObjectivesData on patient safety problems (PSPs) in ambulatory care are scarce. The aim of the study was to record the frequency, type, severity and point of origin of PSPs in ambulatory care in Germany.DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study.SettingComputer-assisted telephone interviews with randomly recruited citizens aged ≥40 years in Germany who were asked about their experiences with PSPs in ambulatory care.Participants10 037 citizens ≥40 years.MeasuresA new questionnaire was developed to record patient experiences with PSPs in ambulatory care. The study reported here targets patient experiences in the last 12 months. The questionnaire focuses on PSPs in seven areas of medical treatment: anamnesis/diagnostic procedures; medication; vaccination, injection, infusion; aftercare; outpatient surgery; office administration; other areas. For each PSP reported, detailed questions were asked about the specialist group concerned, and, on the most serious harm, the severity of the harm and its consequences. The target parameters are presented as proportions with 95% CIs.Results1422 of the respondents (14%) reported 2589 PSPs. The areas most frequently affected by PSPs were anamnesis/diagnostic procedures (61%) and medication (15%). General practitioners accounted for 44% of PSPs, orthopaedists for 15% and internists for 10%. 75% of PSPs were associated with harm, especially unnecessarily prolonged pain or deterioration of health; 35% of PSPs led to permanent harm. 804 PSPs (32%) prompted patients to see another doctor for additional treatment; 255 PSPs (10%) required inpatient treatment.ConclusionPSPs experienced by patients are widespread in ambulatory care in Germany. The study reveals in which areas of medical treatment efforts to prevent PSPs could make the greatest contribution to improving patient safety. It also demonstrates the valuable contribution of patient reports to the analysis of PSPs.
Funder
Innovation Committee of the Federal Joint Committee, Germany
Reference31 articles.
1. Institute of Medicine . Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2001.
2. World Health Organization . The conceptual framework for the International classification for patient safety (ICPs). Geneva, 2009.
3. Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen (SVR) . Gutachten 2007 des SVR. Available: dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/16/063/1606339.pdf[Accessed 25 Jul 2019].
4. Prevalence and consequences of patient safety incidents in general practice in the Netherlands: a retrospective medical record review study
5. Stocks SJ , Donnelly A , Esmail A , et al . Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patient’s perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020952.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020952
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献