Patient safety in ambulatory care from the patient's perspective: a retrospective, representative telephone survey

Author:

Geraedts MaxORCID,Krause Svenja,Schneider Michael,Ortwein Annette,Leinert Johannes,de Cruppé Werner

Abstract

ObjectivesData on patient safety problems (PSPs) in ambulatory care are scarce. The aim of the study was to record the frequency, type, severity and point of origin of PSPs in ambulatory care in Germany.DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study.SettingComputer-assisted telephone interviews with randomly recruited citizens aged ≥40 years in Germany who were asked about their experiences with PSPs in ambulatory care.Participants10 037 citizens ≥40 years.MeasuresA new questionnaire was developed to record patient experiences with PSPs in ambulatory care. The study reported here targets patient experiences in the last 12 months. The questionnaire focuses on PSPs in seven areas of medical treatment: anamnesis/diagnostic procedures; medication; vaccination, injection, infusion; aftercare; outpatient surgery; office administration; other areas. For each PSP reported, detailed questions were asked about the specialist group concerned, and, on the most serious harm, the severity of the harm and its consequences. The target parameters are presented as proportions with 95% CIs.Results1422 of the respondents (14%) reported 2589 PSPs. The areas most frequently affected by PSPs were anamnesis/diagnostic procedures (61%) and medication (15%). General practitioners accounted for 44% of PSPs, orthopaedists for 15% and internists for 10%. 75% of PSPs were associated with harm, especially unnecessarily prolonged pain or deterioration of health; 35% of PSPs led to permanent harm. 804 PSPs (32%) prompted patients to see another doctor for additional treatment; 255 PSPs (10%) required inpatient treatment.ConclusionPSPs experienced by patients are widespread in ambulatory care in Germany. The study reveals in which areas of medical treatment efforts to prevent PSPs could make the greatest contribution to improving patient safety. It also demonstrates the valuable contribution of patient reports to the analysis of PSPs.

Funder

Innovation Committee of the Federal Joint Committee, Germany

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine . Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2001.

2. World Health Organization . The conceptual framework for the International classification for patient safety (ICPs). Geneva, 2009.

3. Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen (SVR) . Gutachten 2007 des SVR. Available: dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/16/063/1606339.pdf[Accessed 25 Jul 2019].

4. Prevalence and consequences of patient safety incidents in general practice in the Netherlands: a retrospective medical record review study

5. Stocks SJ , Donnelly A , Esmail A , et al . Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patient’s perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020952.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020952

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3