Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
“Diagnostic excellence,” as a relatively new construct centered on the diagnostic process and its health-related outcomes, can be refined by patient reporting and its measurement. We aimed to explore the scope of patient-reported outcome (PRO) and patient-reported experience (PRE) domains that are diagnostically relevant, regardless of the future diagnosed condition, and to review the state of measurement of these patient-reported domains.
Methods
We conducted an exploratory analysis to identify these domains by employing a scoping review supplemented with internal expert consultations, 24-member international expert convening, additional environmental scans, and the validation of the domains’ diagnostic relevance via mapping these onto patient diagnostic journeys. We created a narrative bibliography of the domains illustrating them with existing measurement examples.
Results
We identified 41 diagnostically relevant PRO and PRE domains. We classified 10 domains as PRO, 28 as PRE, and three as mixed PRO/PRE. Among these domains, 19 were captured in existing instruments, and 20 were captured only in qualitative studies. Two domains were conceptualized during this exploratory analysis with no examples identified of capturing these domains. For 27 domains, patients and care partners report on a specific encounter; for 14 domains, reporting relates to an entire diagnostic journey over time, which presents particular measurement opportunities and challenges.
Conclusion
The multitude of PRO and PRE domains, if measured rigorously, would allow the diagnostic excellence construct to evolve further and in a manner that is patient-centered, prospectively focused, and concentrates on effectiveness and efficiency of diagnostic care on patients’ well-being.
Funder
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and, Medicine, & Institute of Medicine, Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care. (2015). Improving diagnosis in Health Care. National Academies.
2. Burstin, H., & Cosby, K. (2022). Measuring performance of the diagnostic process. Journal of the American Medical Association, 328(2), 143–144. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.10166
3. Yang, D., Fineberg, H. V., & Cosby, K. (2021). Diagnostic Excellence JAMA, 326(19), 1905–1906, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.19493
4. Jacobson, R. P., Kang, D., & Houck, J. (2020). Can patient-reported outcomes measurement information system® (PROMIS) measures accurately enhance understanding of acceptable symptoms and functioning in primary care? Journal of patient-reported Outcomes, 4(1), 39–39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00206-9
5. Giardina, T. D., Shahid, U., Mushtaq, U., Upadhyay, D. K., Marinez, A., & Singh, H. (2022). Creating a learning health system for improving diagnostic safety: pragmatic insights from US health care organizations. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(15), 3965–3972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07554-w