Development and Psychometric Analysis of a Patient-Reported Measure of Diagnostic Excellence for Emergency and Urgent Care Settings

Author:

Gleason Kelly T.1ORCID,Dukhanin Vadim2,Peterson Susan K.3,Gonzalez Natalia4,Austin J.M.5,McDonald K.M.

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland

2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

4. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

5. Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality and Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

Background Emergency and urgent care settings face challenges with routinely obtaining performance feedback related to diagnostic care. Patients and their care partners provide an important perspective on the diagnostic process and outcome of care in these settings. We sought to develop and test psychometric properties of Patient-Report to IMprove Diagnostic Excellence in Emergency Department settings (PRIME-ED), a measure of patient-reported diagnostic excellence in these care settings. Methods We developed PRIME-ED based on literature review, expert feedback, and cognitive testing. To assess psychometric properties, we surveyed AmeriSpeak, a probability-based panel that provides sample coverage of approximately 97% of the U.S. household population, in February 2022 to adult patients, or their care partners, who had presented to an emergency department or urgent care facility within the last 30 days. Respondents rated their agreement on a 5-point Likert scale with each of 17 statements across multiple domains of patient-reported diagnostic excellence. Demographics, visit characteristics, and a subset of the Emergency Department Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems were also collected. We conducted psychometric testing for reliability and validity. Results Over a thousand (n = 1116) national panelists completed the PRIME-ED survey, of which 58.7% were patients and 40.9% were care partners; 49.6% received care at an emergency department and 49.9% at an urgent care facility. Responses had high internal consistency within 3 patient-reported diagnostic excellence domain groupings: diagnostic process (Cronbach’s alpha 0.94), accuracy of diagnosis (0.93), and communication of diagnosis (0.94). Domain groupings were significantly correlated with concurrent Emergency Department Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems items. Factor analyses substantiated 3 domain groupings. Conclusions PRIME-ED has potential as a tool for capturing patient-reported diagnostic excellence in emergency and urgent care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference55 articles.

1. Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: the "Big Three" - vascular events, infections, and cancers;Diagnosis (Berl),2019

2. Diagnostic error: the hidden epidemic;Physician Exec,2011

3. The next organizational challenge: finding and addressing diagnostic error;Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf,2014

4. Defining diagnostic error: a scoping review to assess the impact of the national academies' report improving diagnosis in health care;J Patient Saf,2022

5. Identifying trigger concepts to screen emergency department visits for diagnostic errors;Diagnosis (Berl),2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3