Author:
Matterne Uwe,Theurich Melissa A.,Pröbstl Simone,Pieper Dawid,Wang Jiancong,Xu Anna,Apfelbacher Christian
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Only rigorously prepared analyses can provide the highest level of evidence to inform decision-making. Several recent systematic reviews (SRs) examined the hypothesis that the early introduction of specific allergenic complementary foods (CFs) to infants may lead to a lower incidence of one or more allergic outcomes. However, the methodological rigour and quality of reporting of SRs in this area has not yet been systematically evaluated.
Methods
We comprehensively searched PubMed, Medline (Ovid), and Web of Science Core Collection on 13th January 2022, using a pre-specified and tested search syntax for SRs with RCT evidence on the early introduction of allergenic CFs as a means for allergy prevention in infants and children. We examined the quality and risk of bias (RoB) using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS tools, examined adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for SRs and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and checked whether certainty of the evidence was assessed.
Results
Twelve SRs were included. Application of both tools resulted in similar overall judgements in terms of direction and extent for nine of the 12 SRs. Nine SRs were found to be of critically low to low quality according to AMSTAR-2 and to be at high RoB according to ROBIS. One SR received a moderate quality rating (AMSTAR-2) and high RoB rating (ROBIS). However, for two SRs, judgements between AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS were at stark variance. Only two SRs fully adhered to the PRISMA checklist. Six SRs evaluated the certainty of the body of RCT evidence. Several SRs failed to consider unpublished studies either by an explicit a priori exclusion or by inadequate search strategies.
Conclusions
Well-conducted SRs are important for decision-making and informing guideline development, the quality of their methodology should therefore be considered. The methodological rigour and the reporting quality of SRs on the timing of CF for allergy prevention must be improved.
Registration
https://osf.io/7cs4b.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Epidemiology
Reference60 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Summary Health Statistics: National Health Interview Survey., 2018. 2018. http://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/NHIS/SHS/2018_SHS_Table_C-2.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2021.
2. Natsume O, Ohya Y. Recent advancement to prevent the development of allergy and allergic diseases and therapeutic strategy in the perspective of barrier dysfunction. Allergology Int. 2018;67:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alit.2017.11.003
3. Prescott S, Nowak-Węgrzyn A. Strategies to prevent or reduce allergic disease. Ann Nutr Metab. 2011;59(suppl 1):28–42. https://doi.org/10.1159/000334150
4. Krawiec M, Fisher HR, Du Toit G, Bahnson HT, Lack G. Overview of oral tolerance induction for prevention of food allergy-Where are we now? Allergy 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14758
5. Kimani-Murage EW, Nyamasege CK, Mutoni S, Macharia T, Wanjohi M, Kamande EW, et al. Chapter 7 - Personalized Nutrition for Women, Infants, and children. In: Galanakis CM, editor. Trends in Personalized Nutrition. Academic Press; 2019. pp. 169–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816403-7.00008-8
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献