Most systematic reviews reporting adherence to AMSTAR 2 had critically low methodological quality: a cross-sectional meta-research study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Most systematic reviews reporting adherence to AMSTAR 2 had critically low methodological quality: a cross-sectional meta-research study

Published:2024-01 Issue: Volume:165 Page:111210
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Bojcic Ruzica^ORCID,Todoric Mate,Puljak Livia^ORCID

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference28 articles.

1. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews;Shea;BMC Med Res Methodol,2007

2. Amstar 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both;Shea;BMJ,2017

3. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR;Dosenovic;BMC Med Res Methodol,2018

4. Quality of systematic reviews on timing of complementary feeding for early childhood allergy prevention;Matterne;BMC Med Res Methodol,2023

5. Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies;Hammel;BMC Med Res Methodol,2022

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The confidence in the results of physiotherapy systematic reviews in the musculoskeletal field is not increasing over time: a meta-epidemiological study using AMSTAR 2 tool;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2024-05

2. Author instructions in biomedical journals infrequently address systematic review reporting and methodology: a cross-sectional study;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2024-02