Author:
Jiao Shuzhen,Zeng Fanwei,Huang Yaping,Zhang Libing,Mao Juan,Chen Baihong
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Grafting is one of the promising techniques for improving abiotic stress tolerance in horticultural crops, but the underlying regulatory mechanisms of drought on grafted grapevine are largely unexplored.
Results
Herein, we investigated the phenotypic, physiologic, biochemical, and drought related genes change of self-rooted 1103P (1103 Paulsen), SM (Shine Muscat) and grafted SM/1103P (SM shoot/1103P root) under drought stress condition. The results indicated that grafted grapevine effectively alleviated drought damage in grape leaves by higher RWC, water potential and free water content. Drought stress led to the alterations of chlorophyll, carotenoid, photosynthetic parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence in grapevine leaves after drought treatment indicated grafted plants improved the photosystem response to drought stress. Moreover, grafted plants under drought stress exhibited higher levels of abscisic acid (ABA), indoleacetic acid (IAA) and soluble protein, but less contents of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) both in leaves and roots. Drought stress also increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD and CAT) and activated the transcript expression of VvCu/ZnSOD, VvPOD4 and VvCAT1) in both leaves and roots. Further expression analysis by real-time PCR indicated that the expression levels of ABA-dependent and ABA-independent related genes could be activated in grafted grape after drought treatment.
Conclusions
Taken together, our findings demonstrated that grafting onto 1103P enhanced tolerance against drought stress in grape by improving water content, photosynthesis and antioxidant defense capacity, which provided a valuable information for understanding the mechanisms of drought tolerance regulated by grafting plants.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference81 articles.
1. Zhu JK. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53(1):247–73.
2. Osmolovskaya N, Shumilina J, Kim A, Didio A, Grishina T, Bilova T, et al. Methodology of drought stress research: experimental setup and physiological characterization. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(12):4089–114.
3. Gupta A, Rico-Medina A, Caño-Delgado AI. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science. 2020;368(6488):266–9.
4. Skirycz A, Inze D. More from less: plant growth under limited water. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010;21(2):197–203.
5. Fanizza G, Ricciardi L. Influence of drought stress on shoot, leaf growth, leaf water potential, stomatal resistance in wine grape genotypes (Vitis vinifera L.). Vitis. 2015;29:371–81.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献