Author:
Paez-Granados Diego,Billard Aude
Abstract
AbstractAutonomous mobility devices such as transport, cleaning, and delivery robots, hold a massive economic and social benefit. However, their deployment should not endanger bystanders, particularly vulnerable populations such as children and older adults who are inherently smaller and fragile. This study compared the risks faced by different pedestrian categories and determined risks through crash testing involving a service robot hitting an adult and a child dummy. Results of collisions at 3.1 m/s (11.1 km/h/6.9 mph) showed risks of serious head (14%), neck (20%), and chest (50%) injuries in children, and tibia fracture (33%) in adults. Furthermore, secondary impact analysis resulted in both populations at risk of severe head injuries, namely, from falling to the ground. Our data and simulations show mitigation strategies for reducing impact injury risks below 5% by either lowering the differential speed at impact below 1.5 m/s (5.4 km/h/3.3 mph) or through the usage of absorbent materials. The results presented herein may influence the design of controllers, sensing awareness, and assessment methods for robots and small vehicles standardization, as well as, policymaking and regulations for the speed, design, and usage of these devices in populated areas.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. International Federation of Robotics. World Robotics—Service Robots Report (Tech. Rep, International Federation of Robotics (IFR), Frankfurt, 2020).
2. ISO22737-2021. Intelligent transport systems—low-speed automated driving (LSAD) systems for predefined routes—performance requirements, system requirements and performance test procedures-ISO 22737. Tech. Rep., International Organization for Standarization, Geneva, Switzerland (2020).
3. Mansfeld, N., Hamad, M., Becker, M., Marin, A. G. & Haddadin, S. aSafety map: A unified representation for biomechanics impact data and robot instantaneous dynamic properties. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3, 1880–1887. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.2801477 (2018).
4. Althoff, M., Giusti, A., Liu, S. B. & Pereira, A. Effortless creation of safe robots from modules through self-programming and self-verification. Sci. Robot. 4. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaw1924(2019). https://robotics.sciencemag.org/content/4/31/eaaw1924.full.pdf.
5. Haddadin, S. et al. On making robots understand safety: Embedding injury knowledge into control. Int. J. Robot. Res. 31, 1578–1602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364912462256 (2012).
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献