Abstract
AbstractThe use of strongly biased data generally leads to large distortions in a trained machine learning model. We face this problem when constructing a predictor for earthquake-generated ground-motion intensity with machine learning. The machine learning predictor constructed in this study has an underestimation problem for strong motions, although the data fit on relatively weak ground motions is good. This underestimation problem is caused by the strong bias in available ground-motion records; there are few records of strong motions in the dataset. Therefore, we propose a hybrid approach of machine learning and conventional ground-motion prediction equation. This study demonstrates that this hybrid approach machine learning technology and physical model reduces the underestimation of strong motions and leads to better prediction than either of the individual approaches applied alone.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Kong, Q. et al. Machine learning in seismology: turning data into insights. Seismol. Res. Lett. 90(1), 3–14 (2018).
2. Bergen, K. J., Johnson, P. A., De Hoop, M. V. & Beroza, G. C. Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience. Science 363, 6433 (2019).
3. Raji, I. & Buolamwini, J. Actionable auditing: investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial AI products. In AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society (2019).
4. Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. Gender shades: inter-sectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Proc. Machine Learning Res. Conf. Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, 77–91 (2018).
5. Douglas, J. Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth Sci. Rev. 61(1), 43–104 (2003).
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献