Abstract
AbstractAfter large-magnitude earthquakes, a crucial task for impact assessment is to rapidly and accurately estimate the ground shaking in the affected region. To satisfy real-time constraints, intensity measures are traditionally evaluated with empirical Ground Motion Models that can drastically limit the accuracy of the estimated values. As an alternative, here we present Machine Learning strategies trained on physics-based simulations that require similar evaluation times. We trained and validated the proposed Machine Learning-based Estimator for ground shaking maps with one of the largest existing datasets (<100M simulated seismograms) from CyberShake developed by the Southern California Earthquake Center covering the Los Angeles basin. For a well-tailored synthetic database, our predictions outperform empirical Ground Motion Models provided that the events considered are compatible with the training data. Using the proposed strategy we show significant error reductions not only for synthetic, but also for five real historical earthquakes, relative to empirical Ground Motion Models.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. de la Puente, J., Rodriguez, J. E., Monterrubio-Velasco, M., Rojas, O. & Folch, A. Urgent supercomputing of earthquakes: use case for civil protection. In Proceedings of the Platform for Advanced Scientific Computing Conference, 1–8 (2020).
2. Ejarque, J. et al. Enabling dynamic and intelligent workflows for HPC, data analytics, and AI convergence. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 134, 414–429 (2022).
3. Douglas, J. Ground motion prediction equations 1964–2021. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK 670 (2020).
4. Petersen, M. D. et al. Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps. Technical Report, US Geological Survey Open-File Report (2008).
5. Wald, D. J., Worden, C. B., Thompson, E. M. & Hearne, M. Shakemap operations, policies, and procedures. Earthq. Spectra 38, 756–777 (2022).