Willingness to donate genomic and other medical data: results from Germany

Author:

Voigt Torsten H.ORCID,Holtz Verena,Niemiec Emilia,Howard Heidi C.,Middleton Anna,Prainsack Barbara

Abstract

AbstractThis paper reports findings from Germany-based participants in the “Your DNA, Your Say” study, a collaborative effort among researchers in more than 20 countries across the world to explore public attitudes, values and opinions towards willingness to donate genomic and other personal data for use by others. Based on a representative sample of German residents (n = 1506) who completed the German-language version of the survey, we found that views of genetic exceptionalism were less prevalent in the German-language arm of the study than in the English-language arm (43% versus 52%). Also, people’s willingness to make their data available for research was lower in the German than in the English-language samples of the study (56% versus 67%). In the German sample, those who were more familiar with genetics, and those holding views of genetic exceptionalism were more likely to be willing to donate data than others. We explain these findings with reference to the important role that the “right of informational self-determination” plays in German public discourse. Rather than being a particularly strict interpretation of privacy in the sense of a right to be left alone, the German understanding of informational self-determination bestows on each citizen the responsibility to carefully consider how their personal data should be used to protect important rights and to serve the public good.

Funder

King's College London

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics

Reference21 articles.

1. DeFrancesco L, Jarchum I. Focus on wearable sensors. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;4:329.

2. Tempini N, Leonelli S. Genomics and big data in biomedicine. In: Gibbon S, Prainsack P, Hilgartner S, Lamoreaux J, editors. Routledge Handbook of Genomics, Health and Society, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2018. p. 24–31.

3. Fiske A, Buyx A, Prainsack B. Health information counselors: a new profession for the age of big data. Acad Med. 2019;1:37.

4. Neff G. Why big data won’t cure us. Big Data. 2013;3:117–23.

5. Weber GM, Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Finding the missing link for big biomedical data. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;24:2479–80.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3