Repercussions of patrilocal residence on mothers' social support networks among Tsimane forager–farmers

Author:

Seabright Edmond12,Alami Sarah13ORCID,Kraft Thomas S.4ORCID,Davis Helen5,Caldwell Ann E.6,Hooper Paul27,McAllister Lisa8,Mulville Sarah9,Veile Amanda10,von Rueden Christopher11,Trumble Benjamin12,Stieglitz Jonathan13ORCID,Gurven Michael3ORCID,Kaplan Hillard2

Affiliation:

1. School of Collective Intelligence, Mohammed 6 Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco

2. Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA

3. Department of Anthropology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA

4. Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA

5. Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 01451, USA

6. Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80217, USA

7. Economic Science Institute, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA

8. Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

9. Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA

10. Department of Anthropology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

11. Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, USA

12. Center for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1701, USA

13. Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, Toulouse 1 Capitol University, Toulouse 31080, France

Abstract

While it is commonly thought that patrilocality is associated with worse outcomes for women and their children due to lower social support, few studies have examined whether the structure of female social networks covaries with post-marital residence. Here, we analyse scan sample data collected among Tsimane forager–farmers. We compare the social groups and activity partners of 181 women residing in the same community as their parents, their husband's parents, both or neither. Relative to women living closer to their in-laws, women living closer to their parents are less likely to be alone or solely in the company of their nuclear family (odds ratio (OR): 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3–0.9), and more likely to be observed with others when engaging in food processing and manufacturing of market or household goods, but not other activities. Women are slightly more likely to receive childcare support from outside the nuclear family when they live closer to their parents (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 0.8–3.9). Their social group size and their children's probability of receiving allocare decrease significantly with distance from their parents, but not their in-laws. Our findings highlight the importance of women's proximity to kin, but also indicate that patrilocality per se is not costly to Tsimane women. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Cooperation among women: evolutionary and cross-cultural perspectives’.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Jeans and language: kin networks and reproductive success are associated with the adoption of outgroup norms;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2024-01-22

2. Correction to: ‘Repercussions of patrilocal residence on mothers’ social support networks among Tsimane forager–farmers’ (2022) by Seabright et al.;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2023-03-06

3. New perspectives on the evolution of women's cooperation;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2022-11-28

4. Sex differences in cooperative coalitions: a mammalian perspective;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2022-11-28

5. Repercussions of patrilocal residence on mothers' social support networks among Tsimane forager–farmers;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2022-11-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3