Validation of Digital Applications for Evaluation of Visual Parameters: A Narrative Review

Author:

Mena-Guevara Kevin J.ORCID,Piñero David P.ORCID,de Fez DoloresORCID

Abstract

The current review aimed to collect and critically analyze the scientific peer-reviewed literature that is available about the use of digital applications for evaluation of visual parameters in electronic devices (tablets and smartphones), confirming if there are studies calibrating and validating each of these applications. Three bibliographic search engines (using the search equation described in the paper) and the Mendeley reference manager search engine were used to complete the analysis. Only articles written in English and that are evaluating the use of tests in healthy patients to measure or characterize any visual function aspects using tablets or smartphones were included. Articles using electronic visual tests to assess the results of surgical procedures or are conducted in pathological conditions were excluded. A total of 19 articles meeting these inclusion and exclusion criteria were finally analyzed. One critical point of all these studies is that there was no mention of the characterization (spatial and/or colorimetrical) of screens and the stimuli used in most of them. Only two studies described some level of calibration of the digital device before the beginning of the study. Most revised articles described non-controlled comparatives studies (73.7%), reporting some level of scientific evidence on the validation of tools, although more consistent studies are needed.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cell Biology,Cognitive Neuroscience,Sensory Systems,Optometry,Ophthalmology

Reference38 articles.

1. The validity of visual acuity assessment using mobile technology devices in the primary care setting;O’Neill;Aust. Fam. Physician,2016

2. New iPAD-based test for the detection of color vision deficiencies

3. Colorimetric Characterization of Mobile Devices for Vision Applications

4. Study of Social Networkshttps://iabspain.es/wp-content/uploads/estudio-redes-sociales-2018_vreducida.pdf

5. Citizens before e-Health. Opinions and Expectations of Citizens on the Use and Application of ICT in the Health Fieldhttps://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/sites/ontsi/files/los_ciudadanos_ante_la_e-sanidad.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3