Influence of computer parameters on Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity test values using different computers

Author:

Ichhpujani Parul1ORCID,Singh Drishti,Thakur Sahil2ORCID,Kumar Suresh1

Affiliation:

1. Government Medical College and Hospital

2. Singapore Eye Research Institute

Abstract

Abstract

Background To see the influence of various computer parameters on contrast sensitivity values obtained with the web based, Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity (SPARCS) test.Method This prospective, observational study enrolled 80 consecutive healthy individuals free of ocular disease. Each patient underwent SPARCS CS testing on both the laptops, Apple Macbook and the Surface Pro. SPARCS scores were identified as the primary outcome variables and other ocular parameters were considered secondary outcome variables.Results Data of 160 eyes of 80 subjects who fulfilled the inclusion criteria was evaluated. The average age was 26.75 ± 5.75 years (range 18–40 years) and there was a slight female preponderance (61%, n = 49). None of the eyes had history of any ocular pathology. The Bland-Altman (BA) plot highlights a mean difference of 0.694 in measurements between the Macbook Air and Surface Pro indicating a small bias between the two methods. However, the wider limits of agreement (-12.889 to 14.276 ) suggest that the differences between the two can be substantial for some measurements. This variability is supported by the correlation matrix, which shows that while there is a positive relationship between equivalent measurements on the two devices, but they are not close to 1.Conclusion Given the importance of consistency in contrast sensitivity testing, especially for baseline and follow-up assessments, this data suggests that using different devices may introduce a level of variability that could confound results. Thus, it is essential to use the same device, especially in clinical scenarios, to get precise and reproducible results.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference12 articles.

1. World Health Organization. World report on vision. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/world-report-on-vision (Accessed on 17th April, 2024).

2. VLEG/GBD 2020 model [Internet]. Accessed via the IAPB Vision Atlas. (Accessed on 17th April, 2024).

3. World blindness and visual impairment: despite many successes, the problem is growing;Ackland P;Community Eye Health,2017

4. Contrast sensitivity testing: a more complete assessment of vision;Jindra LF;J Cataract Refract Surg,1989

5. Contrast Sensitivity and Glaucoma;Ichhpujani P;J Glaucoma,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3