Affiliation:
1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
2. DICAM (Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering), University of Trento, Via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento, Italy
Abstract
The international commitment to achieve carbon neutrality in the next few decades has oriented human activities towards the preservation of natural and non-renewable resources. In this context, a great research effort has been devoted to the search for sustainable solutions for the infrastructure construction sector, based on a thorough assessment of the environmental impact (EI). In this regards, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is considered one of the main components of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and, for a comprehensive analysis, all the costs incurred by stakeholders during the useful life of the infrastructure should also be taken into account, applying the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) methodology. So far, there is a lack of combined LCA and LCC analyses of railway projects to support a proper sustainable decision-making process at a project level. Therefore, this study aimed to contributed to this topic by determining the environmental effect and related costs of different planning and construction choices in terms of material and maintenance strategies. For this purpose, first, an LCA of typical railway infrastructures with a ballasted track was developed. The case study considered two different functional units of a double-track railway line: 1 km of embankment section and 1 km of a cut section, in straight alignment. After defining five alternative railway infrastructure scenarios with different materials (virgin or recycled material) and construction methods (e.g., lime stabilization), two different railway track maintenance approaches were analysed. SimaPro was used to analyse the case study, and the results were compared with those obtained using the PaLATE software, suitably adapted for use in the railway sector. Finally, a cost analysis was carried out using Life Cycle Cost (LCC) methodology for all the scenarios analysed. The results obtained in terms of EI and related costs of each scenario provide useful information, allowing a sustainable planning approach: as a general result, the initial construction phase always involves the larger part of the total environmental impact while the material production is the most polluting phase, reaching percentages always higher than 50% of the total.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference34 articles.
1. Stripple, H., and Uppenberg, S. (2010). Life Cycle Assessment of Railways and Rail Transports-Application in Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) for the Bothnia Line the Report Can Be Ordered Via, IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet.
2. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Assessment of Infrastructure Construction for California’s High-Speed Rail System;Chang;Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ.,2011
3. International Union of Railway (2016). Carbon Footprint of Railway Infrastructure Comparing Existing Methodologies on Typical Corridors Recommendations for Harmonized Approach, International Union of Railway.
4. Embodied Emissions in Rail Infrastructure: A Critical Literature Review;Olugbenga;Environ. Res. Lett.,2019
5. Viak, A. (2011). New Double Track Line Oslo-Ski Life Cycle Assessment of the Follo Line-Infrastructure, Norwegian National Rail Administration.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献