The Teacher Accessibility, Equity, and Content (TEC) Rubric for Evaluating Computing Curricula

Author:

Weintrop David1ORCID,Coenraad Merijke1,Palmer Jen2,Franklin Diana2

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland, USA

2. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

Abstract

In response to the growing call to bring the powerful ideas of computer science to all learners, education decision makers, including teachers and administrators, are tasked with making consequential decisions on what curricula to use. Often, these decision makers have not been trained in computer science and are unfamiliar with the concepts taught and tools used. This is especially true in K–12 contexts where computer science expertise is less prevalent. To aid in the decision-making process around computing curricula, this article introduces the TEC Rubric. The TEC Rubric is composed of three main categories: Teacher Accessibility, Equity, and Content designed to support educational decision makers and designers when it comes to computing instruction. Along with presenting the full rubric and the process used in its creation, this article describes two examples of the rubric in action. First, the TEC Rubric is used to evaluate two widespread computer science curricula to demonstrate its evaluative capacity highlighting differences between the two curricula. Second, we show how the TEC Rubric can be used to help inform the design of new K–12 computing curricula. Overall, the TEC Rubric is designed to serve as a useful resource in the ongoing quest to bring effective, equitable, and engaging computing instruction into schools around the world.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Education,General Computer Science

Reference118 articles.

1. AchieveNJ. 2016. The New Jersey Student Learning Standards for Science. https://www.state.nj.us/education/aps/cccs/science/ScienceInstructionCompanion.pdf. AchieveNJ. 2016. The New Jersey Student Learning Standards for Science. https://www.state.nj.us/education/aps/cccs/science/ScienceInstructionCompanion.pdf.

2. Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

3. The CS10K project

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Utilizing a computational thinking engagement inventory to support inclusive computational thinking pathways;Journal of Research on Technology in Education;2024-09-04

2. The CS1 Python Bakery: A Modern "Batteries Included" Open-Source Curriculum with All the Fixings;Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1;2024-07-03

3. Designing Evaluation Criteria for Disciplinary Competencies: A Case Study of Computer Science;2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON);2024-05-08

4. ACESOR: a critical engagement in systems of oppression AI assessment tool;AI and Ethics;2024-04-29

5. Exploring Collaboration as a Bridge to K-8 CS Integration;Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2;2024-03-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3