Safety evaluation of an extension of use of the food enzyme pullulanase from the non‐genetically modified Pullulanibacillus naganoensis strain AE‐PL
-
Published:2024-07
Issue:7
Volume:22
Page:
-
ISSN:1831-4732
-
Container-title:EFSA Journal
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:EFS2
Author:
,Zorn Holger,Barat Baviera José Manuel,Bolognesi Claudia,Catania Francesco,Gadermaier Gabriele,Greiner Ralf,Mayo Baltasar,Mortensen Alicja,Roos Yrjö Henrik,Solano Marize L. M.,Sramkova Monika,Van Loveren Henk,Vernis Laurence,Cavanna Daniele,Criado Ana,de Sousa Rita Sofia Ferreira,Liu Yi,de Nijs Roos Anna
Abstract
Abstract
The food enzyme pullulanase (pullulan 6‐α‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.41) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Pullulanibacillus naganoensis strain AE‐PL by Amano Enzyme Inc. A safety evaluation of this food enzyme was made previously, in which EFSA concluded that this food enzyme did not give rise to safety concerns when used in one food manufacturing process. Subsequently, the applicant has requested to extend its use to include seven additional processes and to revise the previous use level. In this assessment, EFSA updated the safety evaluation of this food enzyme when used in a total of eight food manufacturing processes. As the food enzyme‐total organic solids (TOS) are not carried into the final foods in two food manufacturing processes, the dietary exposure was estimated only for the remaining six processes. The dietary exposure was calculated to be up to 0.004 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. The Panel evaluated the repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats submitted in the previous application and identified a no observed adverse effect level of 643 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested. When compared with the calculated dietary exposure, this resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 160,750. Based on the data provided for the previous evaluation and the revised margin of exposure in the present evaluation, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the revised intended conditions of use.
Reference7 articles.
1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) . (2006). Opinion of the scientific committee related to uncertainties in dietary exposure assessment. EFSA Journal, 5(1), 438. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2007.438 2. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) . (2009). Guidance of the scientific committee on transparency in the scientific aspects of risk assessments carried out by EFSA. Part 2: General principles. EFSA Journal, 7(5), 1051. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1051 3. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) . (2011). Use of the EFSA comprehensive European food consumption database in exposure assessment. EFSA Journal, 9(3), 2097. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2097 4. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids) , Silano, V., Bolognesi, C., Castle, L., Chipman, K., Cravedi, J. P., Fowler, P., Franz, R., Grob, K., Gürtler, R., Husøy, T., Kärenlampi, S., Mennes, W., Milana, M. R., Pfaff, K., Riviere, G., Srinivasan, J., De Fatima Tavares Poças, M., Tlustos, C., … Engel, K.‐H. (2017). Safety evaluation of the food enzyme pullulanase from Pullulanibacillus naganoensis strain AE‐PL. EFSA Journal, 15(10), 5009. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5009 5. EFSA CEP Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids) , Lambré, C., Barat Baviera, J. M., Bolognesi, C., Cocconcelli, P. S., Crebelli, R., Gott, D. M., Grob, K., Lampi, E., Mengelers, M., Mortensen, A., Rivière, G., Steffensen, I.‐L., Tlustos, C., Van Loveren, H., Vernis, L., Zorn, H., Glandorf, B., Herman, L., … Chesson, A. (2021). Scientific guidance for the submission of dossiers on food enzymes. EFSA Journal, 19(10), 6851. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6851
|
|