Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence

Published:2019-04-29 Issue:3 Volume:72 Page:447-465
ISSN:0007-1102
Container-title:British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Br J Math Stat Psychol

Author:

Primi Ricardo¹²^ORCID,Santos Daniel²³,De Fruyt Filip²⁴,John Oliver P.²⁵

Affiliation:

1. Postgraduate Program in Psychology Universidade São Francisco Campinas, São Paulo Brazil

2. EduLab21 Ayrton Senna Institute São Paulo Brazil

3. Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil

4. Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology Ghent University Belgium

5. Department of Psychology and Institute of Personality and Social Psychology University of California, Berkeley California USA

Funder

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),General Medicine,Statistics and Probability

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bmsp.12168

Reference38 articles.

1. Social-emotional skill assessment in children and adolescents: Advances and challenges in personality, clinical, and educational contexts.

2. A rating formulation for ordered response categories

3. Some Observations on the Metric of PC-BILOG Results

4. Modeling Acquiescence in Measurement Models for Two Balanced Sets of Items

5. A Two-Tier Full-Information Item Factor Analysis Model with Applications

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Adaptation and validation for use in Brazil of the Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale (CHAOS);Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica;2024-07-15

2. Who agrees more? The role of age, education, and the ability to solve verbal analogies in acquiescence;Current Issues in Personality Psychology;2024-07-03

3. The Tendency to Agree with Items in Social Survey Regardless of Their Content as a Possible Source of Bias;Czech Sociological Review;2024-06-06

4. Agree to agree: correcting acquiescence bias in the case of fully unbalanced scales with application to UK measurements of political beliefs;Quality & Quantity;2024-05-21

5. Decomposing social-emotional skill rubrics: a methodological approach to examining acquiescence in rubrics’ ratings;Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice;2023-11-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号京ICP备18003416号-3