PIE: A Holistic Preference Concept and Measurement Model

Author:

Kim Hye-Jin1,Park Young-Hoon2,Bradlow Eric T.3,Ding Min4

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor of Marketing, Department of Business and Technology Management, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

2. AMOREPACIFIC Professor of Management and Associate Professor of Marketing, Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University

3. K.P. Chao Professor; Professor of Marketing, Statistics, and Education; Vice-Dean and Director, Wharton Doctoral Programs; and Co-Director of the Wharton Customer Analytics Initiative, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

4. Smeal Professor of Marketing and Innovation, Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, and Advisory Professor of Marketing and Director of Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), School of Management, Fudan University

Abstract

Extant preference measurement research, including conjoint analysis, has been silent on the explicit influence of others in the formation of consumer preferences. This article proposes a new holistic framework of preference, “PIE,” as well as a measurement method to remedy this problem. The new paradigm posits that consumers evaluate products on the basis of different “needs” determined by three sources: (1) P, the physical attributes of the product; (2) I, the individual characteristics of the choice maker; and (3) E, characteristics of an external peer group. To provide an empirically feasible method to capture all three sources of information, the authors propose and test an incentive-aligned approach, a “group-sourced mechanism,” which mimics a consumer's real-life consultation in the presence of his or her friends when making a purchase decision. The results provide support for the PIE framework, including superior predictive performance in a conjoint task that is “stacked against it.” The authors also show how firms can apply the PIE framework for product design. Practitioners, however, must carefully weigh the benefits of the group-sourced preference measurement with the heavier cognitive burden on the respondents in completing the task.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3