Perspective taking can promote short-term inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees

Author:

Adida Claire L.ORCID,Lo AdelineORCID,Platas Melina R.

Abstract

Social scientists have shown how easily individuals are moved to exclude outgroup members. Can we foster inclusion instead? This study leverages one of the most significant humanitarian crises of our time to test whether, and under what conditions, American citizens adopt more inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees. We conduct a nationally representative survey of over 5,000 American citizens in the weeks leading up to the 2016 presidential election and experimentally test whether a perspective-taking exercise increases inclusionary behavior in the form of an anonymous letter supportive of refugees to be sent to the 45th President of the United States. Our results indicate that the perspective-taking message increases the likelihood of writing such a positive letter by two to five percentage points. By contrast, an informational message had no significant effect on letter writing. The effect of the perspective-taking exercise occurs in the short run only, manifests as a behavioral rather than an attitudinal response, and is strongest among Democrats. However, this effect also appears in the subset of Republican respondents, suggesting that efforts to promote perspective taking may move to action a wide cross-section of individuals.

Funder

National Science Foundation

UCSD Academic Senate

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference40 articles.

1. UNHCR (2016) Mid-year trends 2016 (UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva), Technical Report.

2. Adida CL Laitin DD Valfort MA (2016) Why Muslim Integration Fails in Christian-Heritage Societies (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA).

3. How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers

4. Jones JM (2015) Americans again opposed to taking in refugees. Available at www.gallup.com/poll/186866/americans-again-opposed-taking-refugees.aspx. Accessed August 22, 2018.

5. Jones B (2016) Americans’ views of immigrants marked by widening partisan, generational divides. Available at www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/04/15/americans-views-of-immigrants-marked-by-widening-partisan-generational-divides/. Accessed August 22, 2018.

Cited by 127 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Narrative interventions in conflict settings: Harnessing the power of narratives to prevent violence and promote peace;European Review of Social Psychology;2024-09-12

2. Second phase: The activation stage;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

3. First phase: The latency equilibrium;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

4. Reported vote: An observational measure of political stigma;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

5. Dedication;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3