Abstract
This study estimates consumers’ willingness to pay for specific product (quality) and process (agronomic) attributes of table grapes, including taste, texture, external appearance, and the expected number of chemical applications, and for the breeding technology used to develop the plant. Considering varietal traits, on average our survey respondents were willing to pay the highest price premiums for specific offers of improvements in table grape taste and texture, followed by external appearance and expected number of chemical applications. Considering breeding methods, on average our respondents were willing to pay a small premium for table grapes developed using conventional breeding rather than gene editing (e.g., CRISPR). Results from a latent class model identify four different groups of consumers with distinct preferences for grape quality attributes and breeding technologies. The group of consumers most likely to reject gene editing considers both genetic engineering and gene editing to be breeding technologies that produce foods that are morally unacceptable and not safe to eat.
Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference58 articles.
1. What is the difference between genetically modified organisms and genetically engineered organisms?;K. Edmisten;N.C. State Univ. Extension,2016
2. The end of the GMO? Genome editing, gene drives and New Frontiers of Plant Technology;KL Hefferon;Rev Agrarian Studies,2017
3. The economics of genetically modified crops;M. Qaim;Annu Rev Resour Econ,2009
4. Role of new plant breeding technologies for food security and sustainable agricultural development;M. Qaim;Appl Econ Perspect Policy,2020
5. Societal issues and public attitudes toward genetically modified foods;L. Frewer;Trends in Food Science & Technology—Trends Food Sci Technol,2003
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献