Affiliation:
1. Universidad Central de Venezuela
Abstract
In this article we give attention to text interpretation from the perspectives of discourse analysis and hermeneutics because these disciplines provide theoretical and methodological bases for texts analysis in a wide variety of projects both in the humanities and social sciences. As in both cases we are faced with interdisciplinarity, we examine some tensions that arise when attempts are made by one discipline to dominate over the other. The objective is to offer some guidance to young researchers about what following either of these traditions means. The position of some critical discourse analysts related to the claim that hermeneutics today needs to look at linguistics and discourse analysis to renew itself is examined, to which we add the need to give more attention to dialogue analysis in critical discourse studies. Closer collaboration between researchers in both disciplines is suggested.
Publisher
Instituto de Investigaciones Filologicas
Reference46 articles.
1. Bell, Allan (2011). “Reconstructing Babel: Discourse analysis, hermeneutics and the Interpretive Arc”, Discourse studies, 13 (5): 519-568.
2. Beuchot, Mauricio (2008). “Breve exposición de la hermenéutica analógica”, Revista Teología, tomo XLV: 491-502.
3. Billig, Michael (2011). “Rabbinic traditions of interpretation and the hermeneutic arc”, Discourse studies, 13 (5): 569-574.
4. Bolívar, Adriana (2005 [1995]). Discurso e interacción en el texto escrito. 2ª ed. Caracas, Universidad Central de Venezuela.
5. Bolívar, Adriana (2007). “El análisis interaccional del discurso: del texto a la dinámica social”, en Adriana Bolívar (ed.), Análisis del discurso. Por qué y para qué. Caracas, Los Libros de El Nacional/Universidad Central de Venezuela: 249-227.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献