Author:
Goss Megan M.,Min Helen,Strohl Carrie
Reference50 articles.
1. Able, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38, 67–90.
2. Aud, S., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Kristapovich, P., Rathbun, A., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (2013). The condition of education (NCES 2013-037). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
3. Babaci-Wilhite, Z. (2013). A study of escalating debates on the use of a global or local language in education. In D. B. Napier & S. Majhanovich (Eds.), Education, dominance and identity (pp. 121–132). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
4. Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473–498.
5. Brown, B. A., & Spang, E. (2008). Double talk: Synthesizing everyday and science language in the classroom. Science Education, 92(4), 708–732.