1. Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., Lundberg, B. K. S., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 351–372.
2. Cerini, B., Murray, R., Reiss, M. (2003). Student review of the science curriculum. London: Planet Science, The Institute of Education, University of London and The Science Museum
3. Chin, C., & Chia, L. (2006). Problem-based learning: Using ill-structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90, 44–67.
4. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2001). Epistemologically authentic scientific reasoning. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from every day, classroom, to professional settings (pp. 351–392). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
5. Dimopoulos, K., & Smyrnaiou, Z. (2005). Factors related to students’ interest in science learning. In D. Koliopoulos & A. Vavouraki (Eds.), Science education at cross roads: Meeting the challenges of the 21st century (pp. 135–142). Greece: Athens.