1. Abboud-Blanchard, M., et Vandebrouck, F. (2012). Analysing teachers’ practices in technology environments from an activity theoretical approach. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 19(4), 159–164.
2. Abboud, M., et Rogalski, J. (2021). Open dynamic situations of classroom use of digital technologies: investigating teachers’ interventions. Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ. 21, 424–440 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00151-9
3. Arzarello, F., Bosch, M., Gascon, J. et Sabena, C., (2008). The ostensive dimension through the lenses of two didactic approaches. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0086-z
4. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Mariotti. M. A. et Ferri, F. (2003). Semiotic mediation in the Primary School: Durer’s glass – in: H. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard & Seeger F. (eds.) Activity and Sign Grounding Mathematics Education (Festschrift for Michael Otte). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
5. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., et Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artefacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective – in: L. D. English, M. G. Bartolini Bussi, G. A. Jones, R. Lesh & D. Tirosh (eds.) Handbook of international research in mathematics education, 2nd revised edition (720–749). Mahwah, NG: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.