Abstract
AbstractIt is often presumed by those who use propositions in their theories that propositions are representational; that is, that propositions represent the world as being some way. This paper makes two claims against this presumption. First, it argues that it does not follow from the fact that propositions play the theoretical roles usually attributed to them that they are representational. This conclusion is reached by rebutting three arguments that can be made in support of the claim that propositions are representational. This paper then advances the further claim that propositions are not representational. It considers several ways to overcome the difficulties traditionally associated with this claim, particularly how to account for falsity.
Funder
Arts and Humanities Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference27 articles.
1. Candlish, S. (2007). The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth Century Philosophy. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Dodd, J. (2000). An Identity Theory of Truth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Gaskin, R. (2015). The Identity Theory of Truth. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2016) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/truth-identity/.
4. Gaskin, R. (2020). Language and World: A Defence of Linguistic Idealism. Abingdon: Routledge.
5. Grzankowski, A., & Buchanan, R. (2019). Propositions on the cheap. Philosophical Studies, 176(12), 3159–3178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1168-6.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Primitivism;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
2. Inconsistency theories;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
3. Further objections to nihilism;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
4. Truth in philosophy;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10
5. Conclusion;Truth Without Truths;2024-10-10