Abstract
AbstractResearch on students’ perceptions and understanding of technology has shown that students have a narrow view of technology: for example, technology is often manifested in students’ descriptions as artefacts or objects. This study investigates the ways in which students’ understanding of how technology is manifested expands during a series of classroom activities in technology. The study was conducted at a compulsory primary school with eight-year-old students. The data (video and audio recordings) were collected in small-group interactions and in whole-class discussions. In the interactions, the students utilised self-taken photographs to visualise their understanding and perception of technology’s manifestations: object, activity, volition, and knowledge (Mitcham in Thinking through technology. The path between engineering and philosophy, The University of Chicago Press, 1994). Based on their prior knowledge, the students perceived technology as contemporary electrical artefacts. As they engage in a technology project, they develop and expand their understanding of how technology is manifested, as well as relate different manifestations to one another. The findings indicate that students achieve a more advanced understanding of technological manifestations compared to only discussing each manifestation of technology separately.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Engineering,Education
Reference48 articles.
1. Angelides, P. (2001). The development of an efficient technique for collecting and analyzing qualitative data: The analysis of critical incidents. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(3), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390110029058
2. Ankiewicz, P. (2016). Perceptions and attitudes of pupils toward technology. In M. De Vries (Ed.), Handbook of technology education. Springer international handbooks of education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_43-1
3. Ankiewicz, P. (2019). Alignment of the traditional approach to perceptions and attitudes with Mitcham’s philosophical framework of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9443-6
4. Banks, F. (2006). “Technology, design and society” (TDF) versus “science, technology and society” (STS): Learning some lessons. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining technological literacy. Towards an epistemological framework. Palgrave, Macmillan.
5. Blikstein, P., Kabayadondo, Z., Martin, A., & Fields, D. (2017). An assessment instrument of technological literacies in makerspaces and FabLabs. The Research Journal for Engineering Education, 106(1), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20156
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献