Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice

Author:

Leuders TimoORCID,Loibl KatharinaORCID,Sommerhoff DanielORCID,Herppich Stephanie,Praetorius Anna-KatharinaORCID

Abstract

AbstractAssessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of the field, we propose an overarching framework that allows for systematizing foci of interest, goals, methodologies, and theoretical premises as four integral aspects of conducting research in this area. We demonstrate the benefits of the overarching framework by using it as a tool to analyze and systematize previous research from four different research perspectives. Based on this framework, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing studies and, in particular, highlight theoretical premises that are rarely explicitly addressed but become more obvious by using the overarching framework. In addition, we provide directions for future research by drawing connections within and between research perspectives. Our analyses illustrate how the overarching framework can provide a foundation for research synthesis and inform future studies.

Funder

Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg

Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Mathematics

Reference87 articles.

1. Abs, H. J. (2007). Überlegungen zur Modellierung diagnostischer Kompetenz bei Lehrerinnen und Lehrern [Reflections on modeling diagnostic competence in teachers]. In M. Lüders & J. Wissinger (Eds.), Forschung zur Lehrerbildung (pp. 63–84). Münster: Waxmann

2. Alonzo, A. C. (2018). Exploring the learning progression–formative assessment hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 101–103

3. Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Mycek, K. (2010). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middle school students’ writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 199–214

4. Andrade, H. L., Bennett, R. E., & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines. Routledge

5. Becker, S., Spinath, B., Ditzen, B., & Dörfler, T. (2020). Der Einfluss von Stress auf Prozesse beim diagnostischen Urteilen – eine Eye Tracking-Studie mit mathematischen Textaufgaben [The influence of stress on processes in diagnostic judgments—an eye tracking study with mathematical text tasks]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 48, 531–550

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3