Abstract
AbstractThis article analyses how school leaders depict their autonomy and how they make sense of the relationship between autonomy and control. Attention is drawn to three leadership focuses: the pedagogical direction of the school, decision-making over the internal organisation, and school improvement work. The article integrates survey data on Swedish school leaders (n = 1286). In addition, two theoretical categories were applied in the qualitative data analysis to explore how school leaders and local education authorities and its independent counterpart make sense of the relationship between autonomy and control: technical sense-making (TSM) and critical reflective learning. The findings showed that school leaders, both in public and independent schools, experienced a rather high degree of autonomy within the three focuses. The findings also indicated that school leaders in independent schools experienced a higher degree of autonomy regarding the pedagogical direction of the school and school improvement work. However, the effect sizes were low, indicating that the results must be considered with caution. The qualitative data analysis, in turn, revealed an overall emphasis on TSM among school leaders both in public and independent schools, reducing the possibilities for a novel and vibrant leadership. Based on these results, the article concludes that autonomy could constitute an important prerequisite for school leadership, but making sense of the relationship between autonomy and control stands out as even more important for successful school improvement.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Allen, R. (2010). Replicating Swedish ‘free school’ reforms in England. Research in Public Policy, 10, 4–8.
2. Anderson, S., Mascall, B., Stiegelbauer, S., & Park, J. (2012). No one way: Differentiating school district leadership and support for school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 13(4), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9189-y
3. Arneback, E., & A. Bergh. 2010. Den paketerade valfriheten – Om Framtidsvägen för den svenska gymnasieskolan. [The Pre-packaged Freedom of Choice – On the Future of Swedish Upper Secondary School.] Nordic Studies in Education, 30(2), 117–131
4. Bergh, A. (2015). Local quality work in an age of accountability—between autonomy and control. Journal of Education Policy, 30(4), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1017612
5. Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014). Nordic schools in a time of change. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic Educational Model: ‘A School for all’ Encounters Neo-Liberal Policy. Policy Implications of Research in Education 1 (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Springer.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献